Kline Paid Consultant Disrupts Opponents’ Campaigns By admin | August 4, 2008 LikeTweet EmailPrint Remember the uproar over a supporter of Democrat Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton asking a question at the Republican Presidential debate? The problem was not that Retired Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr asked a question. It was that he and CNN didn’t identify him as a co-chairman of Clinton’s National Military Veterans Group. A similar case of non-transparency happened recently involving a person with strong ties to Minnesota Congressman John Kline and his campaign. The UpTake investigated and found the lack of transparency was only the tip of the iceberg in this story. More in this video from Mike McIntee. GO TO BLIP IF YOU WANT TO POST THIS VIDEO ON YOUR BLOG AND CLICK ON SHARE. Video Transcript: Transparency and accessibility are very desirable in our political system. Without accessibility you can’t ask the questions that need to be answered. And without transparency, it’s hard to trust what people tell you. For example, I’m about to tell you a story about Republican Congressman John Kline. But if I didn’t tell you I was a supporter and occasional volunteer for his Democratic opponent Steve Sarvi, that would not be transparent. Transparency was at the heart of Kline’s opening salvo against his Democratic opponent last election cycle.This flyer accused Coleen Rowley of “playing dirty tricks” when one of her volunteers tried to get on Kline’s mailing list and didn’t identify himself as a volunteer for Rowley. This is the woman who’s word the advertisement was based upon. Diana Bratlie was staffing the Kline campaign office when the volunteer, David Bailey, asked to be on the list. She wrote that Bailey used “false pretenses and deception to misrepresent himself.” Fast forward to this election cycle…Kline’s new opponent, Democrat Steve Sarvi, holds a news conference about how high gas prices are forcing a local gravel pit operator to lay off people. Bratlie was there and didn’t reveal her history with the Kline campaign before she went in front of the TV cameras and started arguing with Sarvi about oil drilling in Alaska. Sarvi: “I just don’t think we should be drilling up there.” Bratlie: “So you don’t want any oil exploration whatsoever anywhere.” Sarvi: I didn’t say that. She was trying to get Sarvi to say he was against all oil drilling. And even claimed he had done so when our videotape showed that not to be the case. Bratlie: “Gosh, I stood right there and I watched him say no. And I said ‘nowhere, you wouldn’t drill anywhere?’and he said ‘no’.” McIntee: “No he said he wouldn’t drill in Alaksa.” REWIND SOUND EFFECT Bratlie: “So you don’t want any oil exploration whatsoever anywhere.” Sarvi: “I didn’t say that.” Bratlie: “Yeah you did.” Sarvi: “I said in ANWR. No I didn’t.” Bratlie: “yeah well you said…” McIntee: “You’re putting words in his mouth.” So is this just a case of someone forgetting to reveal she’s working for the other candidate…or was it a planned ambush? I say working because Bratlie told Sarvi she was a Republican, but made no mention that she is a long time Kline volunteer ….a “volunteer” who has made a thousands of dollars as a paid Kline campaign consultant. Bratlie and her husband own a company called “Family Celebrations” that operates out of their house in Lakeville. Since 2004 the Kline campaign has regularly bought research services from Bratlie’s company. Kline’s payments to Bratlie’s company started in January 2004 with $5,385 for “analysis and conversion of database”… followed by another payment of $6,450 in August and $7,925 in November. In 2005 Kline paid her company $10,000 for research. Another $12,000 dollars in 2006 and as recently as April of last year Kline paid her company $3,000. (not included in video- payment of $6,125 for caucus and convention planning in May of 2004)Total so far more than fifty-thousand dollars. Ironically, Bratlie once wrote a letter to the editor accusing Democratic letter writers of being on a candidate’s payroll. She wrote that a few months after her company billed John Kline’s campaign for $10,000 and just a few months before her company billed Kline for $12,000 more. Bratlie was being paid by Kline when she was involved in other activities designed to disrupt Kline’s opponent’s campaign. She was with John Kline’s District Director Mike Osskopp when he attempted to disturb a campaign rally by yelling racial slurs at cars as they pulled into a parking lot. Osskopp: “sure enough… another Jap car. All your buddies are supporting these Jap and German cars.” Osskopp later apologized for his remarks. Kline’s opponent Steve Sarvi has been giving people such as Bratlie plenty of opportunities to ask him questions…holding more than a dozen pre-announced question and answer events in the first week of the campaign alone. However, John Kline has been reluctant to do so in an uncontrolled situation. Video from April 3, 2007 This is Kline at his last open and face-to-face meeting with constituents. He did it only after hundreds of people signed a petition requesting it. You can see why he might be hesitant to do another. The topic was making college tuition more affordable. Kline:“and so I’m looking for solutions. If you got one, I’d love to hear about it.” Student:” Would you like to hear my solution?” Kline: ” Yes” Student: “OK, well maybe you can roll back the tax cuts on the on the very wealthiest Americans.”(Applause & cheering from crowd) Kline’s office promised many more meetings like that one. Since it happened more than a year ago, Kline has not lived up to that promise. Instead holding “tele-town hall meetings” where residents are randomly chosen to listen to Kline answer questions on a phone call.Constituents are given no prior notice that Kline is calling, so there is little time to prepare any questions. So why doesn’t John Kline hold more press conferences to answer questions like his opponent Steve Sarvi does? I asked Kline’s paid consultant Diana Bratlie that question.She said Since Kline has a record he doesn’t have to do that.For The UpTake, I’m Michael McIntee. Related coverage: Bratlie letter in Eagan’s “This Week” newspaper insisting that Sarvi opposes all oil drilling in the United States. I then asked if, hypothetically, the oil companies gave up their current leases, would Sarvi be amiable to allowing them to drill in ANWR and/or off shore? A trade of sorts. He answered, “no.” I responded, “Would you ever consider drilling anywhere in the U.S. … ANWR or off shore.” Answer: “No.” Video:Kline Paid Consultant Challenged On Oil Drilling Disinformation Click here to watch Kline’s paid consultant challenged on camera about her oil drilling disinformation: Bratlie: If the oil problem is going to be corrected by the Arabs drilling more oil, why wouldn’t it be corrected if the Americans drilled more oil? McIntee: Wouldn’t it have something to do with most of the oil in the world is there as opposed to here? Bratlie: But that’s not proven. Theirs is running low. McIntee: The last geo-survey of oil which was printed in the Star Tribune has a nice big map you can see. And if you look at the relative sizes of the countries and the oil, Saudi Arabia pretty much dominates the entire picture while the US makes up like a very small portion of that. And that’s known reserves. Bratlie: That includes ANWR and that includes off-shore drilling and that includes North Dakota and everything? That includes oil shale and all the rest of it? Well then you have me there, I’m going to have to go read that. Support this story and all the stories from The Uptake. Donate.